{"id":"W2016407242","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0098968","title":"Evaluation of a Pooled Strategy for High-Throughput Sequencing of Cosmid Clones from Metagenomic Libraries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Waterloo; Genome Canada","keywords":"Metagenomics; Barcode; Biology; Sanger sequencing; DNA sequencing; Computational biology; Deep sequencing; Illumina dye sequencing; Contig; clone (Java method); Genetics; Genome; Computer science; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005114052,0.001503087,0.00128144,0.001441449,0.0005833402,0.001632822,0.001382804,0.001227157,0.001709127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006924528,0.0006021362,0.001299422,0.001251098,0.0005965303,0.001191584,0.001452376,0.001021847,0.001015828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005986371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001241794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001848043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004245228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995594,0.001164131,0.0004158535,0.001050618,0.001547442,0.0002280528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963325,0.001286466,0.0004667819,0.0005130712,0.001077347,0.0003237283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000612929,0.0003867365,0.00283582,0.0007376735,0.0002988365,0.0002206856,0.0003246437,0.005109746,0.9515842,0.0007541294,0.0003371407,0.03679749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007166977,0.002302045,0.005833372,0.00007235819,0.0004413036,0.0006362088,0.0001980786,0.02967694,0.9543089,0.0003869169,0.00597309,0.0000991519],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643523,0.002127793,0.4262738,0.0001883669,0.0001399362,0.001439214,0.00167614,0.001853416,0.001948991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4122227,0.001395161,0.5759086,0.000282872,0.00004010215,0.001114225,0.006302265,0.0005880073,0.002146014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005114052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02704602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1023182475250712,"score_gpt":0.2342964059359826,"score_spread":0.1319781584109114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}