{"id":"W2016541146","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.01.003","title":"In situ treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater by air sparging","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Research Foundation","keywords":"Arsenic; Air sparging; Groundwater; Aquifer; Sparging; Arsenic contamination of groundwater; Environmental science; Contamination; Environmental chemistry; Human decontamination; Water treatment; Environmental engineering; Environmental remediation; Waste management; Chemistry; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005161377,0.0001523614,0.000444231,0.0001323958,0.00003606325,0.000004907026,0.000157759,0.0001104657,0.0003818739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004756155,0.0001204392,0.0001109885,0.0001259141,0.0001462262,0.0002795362,0.00003438138,0.0001088261,0.00004105773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002750272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001806971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002291395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007960058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984559,0.0002116862,0.0006995605,0.0001659649,0.0002117024,0.0002551443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990454,0.0001464216,0.000551785,0.0001453985,0.00002800187,0.00008298967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004575617,0.001469738,0.08780739,0.00001614821,0.0000942278,0.0001872073,0.0051181,0.0004331639,0.7180384,0.0009044059,0.002163074,0.1833106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01493152,0.009721038,0.3307104,0.00009532235,0.0002087955,0.0009548257,0.0006660155,0.01034548,0.2460176,0.001169066,0.3845082,0.0006717872],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931502,0.00007690019,0.001834026,0.001069827,0.0002619571,0.0001293333,0.000001054025,0.000005158525,0.003471588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980721,0.00007511789,0.00013792,0.0002901647,0.00004383524,0.000004278084,0.000003572411,0.00001076803,0.001362185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4720208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.491137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005041738312667954,"score_gpt":0.2186378753657425,"score_spread":0.2135961370530745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}