{"id":"W2016566795","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.01.003","title":"Choosing how best to choose: Antecedent Volition and decision process representation in discrete choice models","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Volition (linguistics); Representation (politics); Discrete choice; Process (computing); Decision process; Aestivation; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Management science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009023741,0.0005818956,0.001251188,0.00114912,0.0006952381,0.00488237,0.00175142,0.002257944,0.006717693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040162,0.000733954,0.001190011,0.001247225,0.002553909,0.005110926,0.001779668,0.003278056,0.0003470181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001703984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007326679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005820241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954056,0.00320336,0.0002041631,0.0004990383,0.0003395143,0.0003483313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673553,0.02969542,0.0008849466,0.0008457025,0.000616613,0.0006020346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007366217,0.0007370258,0.01036253,0.0001768509,0.000195277,0.000254587,0.002172514,0.3712883,0.0006006704,0.5698612,0.0007084367,0.04290607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005131801,0.00005108763,0.001151807,0.00003186007,0.00005128122,0.00003000106,0.0001952598,0.7708436,0.0001686269,0.2270682,0.0003282295,0.0000286565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3185307,0.0002932845,0.6677915,0.002528839,0.00007835511,0.0001842291,0.0003287118,0.0001487675,0.01011553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965331,0.0001270327,0.03226553,0.0000828045,0.00002506873,0.0001402928,0.0001293946,0.00001769209,0.0018811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009023741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0477227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04553781292878291,"score_gpt":0.3025384815119891,"score_spread":0.2570006685832062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}