{"id":"W2016748774","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.002","title":"Key considerations for logic model development in research partnerships: A Canadian case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"General partnership; Accountability; Logic model; Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07204214,0.0007827948,0.0009520308,0.003697776,0.02740873,0.02040016,0.006966902,0.007564529,0.01305596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1204437,0.0009699225,0.00153795,0.005177042,0.01093209,0.01462302,0.008344395,0.00596225,0.0009317021],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0863395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.188513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.769576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8623519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9301029,0.0499788,0.001501589,0.001572932,0.009647711,0.007196028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150513,0.05888155,0.001763875,0.003256226,0.01675234,0.004294789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002779218,0.000561041,0.006925841,0.0004861733,0.00003135893,0.003023357,0.06722452,0.01257308,0.0009715008,0.8319857,0.01224343,0.06369605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006930072,0.0005968561,0.004726113,0.001862504,0.0002053351,0.002320681,0.2982274,0.06805343,0.004597455,0.3305725,0.2877433,0.0004014737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2002272,0.001535864,0.2120961,0.1556555,0.0003276666,0.005512921,0.0006063773,0.0006327832,0.4234057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7838624,0.0008187674,0.1915713,0.002909967,0.00002565455,0.001604565,0.0001520045,0.0001312981,0.01892407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6264399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9698488794129135,"score_gpt":0.8027374069994443,"score_spread":0.1671114724134692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}