{"id":"W2016846565","doi":"10.1029/2000jc000504","title":"Observations and linear analysis of sill‐generated internal tides and estuarine flow in Haro Strait","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Division of Ocean Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sill; Barotropic fluid; Geology; Internal tide; Baroclinity; Oceanography; Stratification (seeds); Current meter; Internal wave; Geostrophic wind; Amplitude; Advection; Boundary current; Geophysics; Ocean current; Petrology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006442789,0.0001143265,0.0004070989,0.00005732256,0.00009444515,0.00007057258,0.0002192757,0.00005366725,0.0008183398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005643172,0.00008250734,0.00009430323,0.00199617,0.0003522784,0.0003598617,0.00003341582,0.0004150432,0.000002718873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005866265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000635712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003153197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002876955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982337,0.0001383896,0.000447019,0.0001728267,0.0007190281,0.0002889856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984348,0.0006375102,0.0001558969,0.00009821932,0.0004620356,0.0002115552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009571599,0.0001294506,0.9423375,0.0000386287,0.0003307939,0.00004715275,0.000251959,0.004913359,0.0002162434,0.00005203423,0.0003292992,0.05125783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002848786,0.0004269125,0.7467113,0.00004742937,0.00006168755,0.00000545697,0.0002418158,0.2512024,0.00006497285,0.0006618252,0.0002256252,0.0000657551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996448,0.002724593,0.0001042085,0.0003016575,0.00002640889,0.00005465195,0.00002247177,0.000004045918,0.0003139976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927326,0.001747936,0.005198312,0.00002812807,0.00009366233,2.979496e-7,0.000004747224,0.000003301666,0.0001910547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.246289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8960246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05446922092593628,"score_gpt":0.2875560967370887,"score_spread":0.2330868758111524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}