{"id":"W2016865788","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.014","title":"A consistent nonparametric test of parametric regression functional form in fixed effects panel data models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Test statistic; Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Asymptotic distribution; Goldfeld–Quandt test; Null hypothesis; Parametric statistics; Statistics; Null (SQL); Null distribution; Panel data; Statistical hypothesis testing; One- and two-tailed tests; Z-test; Econometrics; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778364,0.0002520481,0.001244885,0.007584725,0.00005549797,0.0001169285,0.000942825,0.0001653274,0.000629305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503613,0.000230349,0.0002765295,0.006456629,0.00007348067,0.001778696,0.0002707808,0.000398186,0.0001853024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002301489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008557364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008071411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003098724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965954,0.00003659771,0.002379468,0.0004530136,0.0001672689,0.0003681949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936458,0.002335185,0.00269343,0.0008395275,0.0002635803,0.0002224247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204443,0.002274693,0.9467821,0.0003374338,0.0005370742,0.00003770569,0.0001263442,0.007431046,0.0000610967,0.005093603,0.008174653,0.02902379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004273342,0.001436401,0.6867769,0.000181042,0.00014724,0.0001067818,0.0001582593,0.2567835,0.0001589111,0.04704003,0.002220386,0.0007171328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.962281,0.01176613,0.02007028,0.0003679739,0.00108176,0.000505949,0.0006470537,0.00001210515,0.003267728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942198,0.001656795,0.003600112,0.000114053,0.0001298839,0.00001098091,0.00009545871,0.00002380308,0.0001491169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2600052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9393359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.274563309808469,"score_gpt":0.2450174027885448,"score_spread":0.02954590701992421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}