{"id":"W2016884651","doi":"10.1016/j.jnca.2006.04.009","title":"A protocol for multi-agent negotiation in a group-choice decision making process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Network and Computer Applications","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Protocol (science); Component (thermodynamics); Variety (cybernetics); Game theory; Multi-agent system; Process (computing); Exploit; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Computer security; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01206009,0.001263662,0.001620563,0.001371671,0.002943806,0.004926756,0.003607349,0.004450299,0.01494945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02661718,0.001022717,0.001445073,0.002153704,0.002547807,0.005369972,0.005281306,0.004245772,0.004396876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001681519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004445844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001952509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001650758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916727,0.004312755,0.0009765824,0.0007094903,0.001913818,0.0004146389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986957,0.008309951,0.0006429068,0.001990873,0.001406214,0.000693202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006291721,0.000269016,0.0003537199,0.00046952,0.0001475526,0.0007665328,0.001919059,0.03475185,0.008212869,0.8492919,0.01299176,0.09019716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001045364,0.0003503771,0.0002658973,0.0002720933,0.0002243282,0.0007055565,0.0003613083,0.2938224,0.01060988,0.5919459,0.1001458,0.0002510474],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003765349,0.00009509055,0.9848836,0.0008273374,0.000230397,0.001218933,0.0002334838,0.000737943,0.008007912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1036346,0.0002691315,0.8776398,0.0003213332,0.0001093864,0.004192091,0.0005791858,0.0002322598,0.01302215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01494945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06378061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03959679504321842,"score_gpt":0.3484922111750855,"score_spread":0.3088954161318671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}