{"id":"W2016888431","doi":"10.3141/2131-11","title":"Analysis of a Gasketed Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe Joint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Gasket; Joint (building); Polyvinyl chloride; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Natural rubber; Pipeline transport; Materials science; Modulus; Composite material; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002178045,0.0002357907,0.0006662377,0.002190263,0.0002004129,0.00006502773,0.0007931867,0.0002039026,0.0001806401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001451925,0.0001803917,0.0006998907,0.004967265,0.0002579484,0.0003002799,0.000002806403,0.001930747,0.000003289461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001682509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001655204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001658782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004865373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994718,0.0002734513,0.001414009,0.0002475376,0.002625886,0.0007211374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969279,0.0004321158,0.0002157563,0.0004926141,0.001610257,0.0003214214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001413278,0.0003481277,0.03149889,0.0005107466,0.002670277,0.0001467669,0.003057051,0.825178,0.108646,0.005799008,0.002819987,0.01791188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006954779,0.0004399538,0.9766631,0.0001685308,0.0002942214,4.257969e-7,0.0003686583,0.006324522,0.01053347,0.002566239,0.001756157,0.0001892762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986839,0.0002943545,0.01088082,0.0009859641,0.0003000381,0.0003521879,0.00005099806,0.00007538952,0.0002212684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981084,0.0006883809,0.0008938752,0.0000185008,0.00008793769,0.00001150834,0.00001648607,0.00003339455,0.0001415446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8388241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04329553992975187,"score_gpt":0.3191890083281272,"score_spread":0.2758934683983753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}