{"id":"W2016993837","doi":"10.1065/lca2004.06.162","title":"Preliminary Assessment of the Environmental Benefits of Enzyme Bleaching for Pulp and Paper Making (7 pp)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Chlorine dioxide; Environmental science; Chlorine; Pulp (tooth); Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Engineering; Chemistry; Production (economics); Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005298048,0.0004244547,0.0003797699,0.00051307,0.0005979426,0.001035275,0.0003465773,0.0007828537,0.004966603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000538781,0.0002170339,0.0005834989,0.0003987154,0.0003322934,0.0005562945,0.000239356,0.0006131317,0.0006436598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004876486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003173445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004661453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01251144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998422,0.00002361924,0.00001063772,0.00002026879,0.0000818582,0.00002138472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996898,0.000131901,0.00001198501,0.00001379404,0.0001230666,0.00002940658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003541694,0.0007952595,0.003523497,0.0005201747,0.00009012184,0.0007301098,0.0001482252,0.002045481,0.9166775,0.0006604868,0.002212199,0.06905539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005960513,0.003275481,0.05463989,0.0000376393,0.0002398683,0.0002670693,0.0003512343,0.001560475,0.9208848,0.000729999,0.0179245,0.00002939621],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494559,0.009460127,0.00847634,0.0008540055,0.0002927443,0.0002419157,0.001433676,0.000133417,0.02965193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512944,0.00388892,0.008224742,0.0003004768,0.00008499092,0.00006064465,0.001518728,0.00004223972,0.03458493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004966603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01661497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01204737701253582,"score_gpt":0.2950962223633291,"score_spread":0.2830488453507933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}