{"id":"W2016993837","doi":"10.1065/lca2004.06.162","title":"Preliminary Assessment of the Environmental Benefits of Enzyme Bleaching for Pulp and Paper Making (7 pp)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Chlorine dioxide; Environmental science; Chlorine; Pulp (tooth); Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Engineering; Chemistry; Production (economics); Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009381585,0.0001397763,0.0002104491,0.00002845962,0.0001214608,0.00002906609,0.0006784807,0.00004210286,0.0001851147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005927554,0.00008596991,0.0001754428,0.00004441012,0.00030308,0.0003651195,0.0005018907,0.0002155635,5.896747e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006825714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000711582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007542752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001485315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980894,0.00008631566,0.0006069548,0.0001417772,0.0009060212,0.0001695472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.0001791333,0.0007010945,0.0002112516,0.00001748731,0.00006881537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003514343,0.001389065,0.6678757,0.0000438775,0.0004021169,0.000006303514,0.001942415,0.2551449,0.05133711,0.003429425,0.0001323718,0.01794532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001096125,0.0003731748,0.9895875,0.00007773211,0.00006361448,0.00005052241,0.001194511,0.001390329,0.0028772,0.002879246,0.0003130433,0.00009699709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944751,0.0001845541,0.001488267,0.002828148,0.0002167557,0.0002970849,0.0000269384,0.000002370268,0.0004808182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954334,0.0001074968,0.003929175,0.0004079371,0.00007532386,0.000008502779,0.000001900116,0.00001295911,0.00002332751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3217118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01204737701253582,"score_gpt":0.2950962223633291,"score_spread":0.2830488453507933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}