{"id":"W2017020721","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.001","title":"Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Safety","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Finite element method; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Conjunction (astronomy); Limit (mathematics); Limit state design; Random variable; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408845,0.00122154,0.001850826,0.002178913,0.001578019,0.003453702,0.002199532,0.002325208,0.0112879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06074676,0.001668221,0.001729437,0.001697803,0.006160502,0.01040464,0.004877509,0.003633445,0.002047741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006012273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001183441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008619492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000571341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955652,0.002325109,0.0002111687,0.0005545082,0.001110847,0.0002331241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757994,0.01820344,0.001075401,0.002306211,0.002270244,0.0003453752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001645651,0.00006422392,0.0006731636,0.0002084603,0.00002210267,0.00007056443,0.000246677,0.04486787,0.0008865703,0.912733,0.001464238,0.03859854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002534775,0.00007892793,0.0001329658,0.00006036801,0.00001470274,0.00006343151,0.00006495172,0.1046621,0.000567155,0.8920351,0.002281599,0.00001334529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0164942,0.000277433,0.9690028,0.0007695594,0.00008834658,0.0001123913,0.0001189278,0.0001067464,0.01302956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5545304,0.001117908,0.4230319,0.0005269371,0.0003610599,0.0008045187,0.0006362553,0.0004850078,0.01850598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04447073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05608476293824564,"score_gpt":0.3530236284965948,"score_spread":0.2969388655583491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}