{"id":"W2017020721","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.001","title":"Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Safety","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Finite element method; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Conjunction (astronomy); Limit (mathematics); Limit state design; Random variable; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002684461,0.0001406818,0.0004911527,0.0002544796,0.00005511907,0.00002356941,0.0005085866,0.00007388544,0.0004633833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003115768,0.00009122818,0.0002414744,0.002054104,0.00008385096,0.0001643042,0.00005748732,0.0001408668,0.000006756786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001557014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004900377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005999132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007150108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973629,0.0001284974,0.00104744,0.0004540776,0.0007500949,0.0002570213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979866,0.0007377987,0.0001893088,0.0008046902,0.0001972855,0.00008430135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003356877,0.00005730339,0.3378645,0.00001246963,0.00005183244,0.000003814457,0.0006052747,0.60678,0.0001461972,0.01102079,0.0001001699,0.04302189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556749,0.00005336576,0.8133759,0.000003426742,0.0000294455,4.225579e-7,0.0000405197,0.05524038,0.00006196929,0.1307437,0.00009823127,0.00009687711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8904968,0.00006438436,0.1062412,0.0005943502,0.0001802299,0.0003833209,0.00006999742,0.00003876544,0.001931028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923579,0.000003667348,0.007478465,0.00003672366,0.0000178725,0.000001407744,0.000008462444,0.000002315104,0.0000932048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5515396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05608476293824564,"score_gpt":0.3530236284965948,"score_spread":0.2969388655583491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}