{"id":"W2017034538","doi":"10.2307/3315939","title":"Testing the equality of multinomial populations ordered by increasing convexity under the alternative","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinomial distribution; Convexity; Statistic; Null (SQL); Mathematics; Test statistic; Likelihood-ratio test; Null hypothesis; Null distribution; Statistics; Alternative hypothesis; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Computer science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004795402,0.0001510088,0.0004582702,0.00006148807,0.0003304369,0.00006526688,0.0004652237,0.00008430107,0.00009343775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1418638,0.00009330371,0.00008242399,0.0002382037,0.0007504337,0.00005697895,0.00002902011,0.0005400876,0.000002227072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002386532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001264291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0200064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009103991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966754,0.001173933,0.001364384,0.0001217422,0.0003714625,0.0002930224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481714,0.04886349,0.001397162,0.0003001368,0.0009087396,0.0003590889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007973501,0.00008623615,0.006290839,0.00006389473,0.0002131532,0.00004186602,0.001216302,0.001059596,0.0003021576,0.9814681,0.003340758,0.005837304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009408469,0.0001076818,0.01813349,0.0001127727,0.0001696311,0.00004942951,0.0005557413,0.0004701819,0.0001771595,0.9790763,0.0000950194,0.0001117857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1300657,0.00005351361,0.8654979,0.00118892,0.0007386816,0.0002747219,0.001836743,0.000005058401,0.0003387529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5216163,0.000001819859,0.4780384,0.0001711323,0.0001490863,0.000001242823,0.000001629953,0.00001392597,0.000006501185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3915506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6838467639401864,"score_gpt":0.5232818070246364,"score_spread":0.16056495691555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}