{"id":"W2017117026","doi":"10.4271/2013-01-2307","title":"Review of Canadian Flight Deck and Cabin Smoke and Fire Incidents: 2001-2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","topic":"Fire dynamics and safety research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration","keywords":"Aeronautics; Smoke; Cockpit; Deck; Environmental science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Aerospace engineering; Structural engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002448226,0.00007868777,0.0001637344,0.0001929489,0.00001964379,0.00004238511,0.0002015163,0.00004348508,0.0002039992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155683,0.00006884654,0.00003955415,0.00010676,0.0000392588,0.0001997669,0.00003677792,0.0001868167,0.000006213465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000960517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01640867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01363494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.0000145264,0.0002725895,0.00005825801,0.0002718458,0.0001403695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991769,0.00004091412,0.00007754167,0.00006897696,0.0004334692,0.0002022088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061469,0.0001207774,0.2245893,0.004030081,0.001614966,0.000361926,0.001738165,0.0008820517,0.01854098,0.002200952,0.6589072,0.08695221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001329663,0.0002008099,0.8845263,0.009033035,0.00004895805,0.0008873423,0.0001874626,0.01225055,0.000383421,0.0006524461,0.0901048,0.0003952843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626924,0.02858266,0.00002655927,0.007156898,0.0004702483,0.0001019973,0.00002710971,0.000004865568,0.0009372037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8683081,0.1304453,0.000649838,0.0002893516,0.00007996421,0.000001967564,0.00000464665,0.00001358499,0.0002072485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.659937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01421337791578472,"score_gpt":0.2576245040493476,"score_spread":0.2434111261335628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}