{"id":"W2017117026","doi":"10.4271/2013-01-2307","title":"Review of Canadian Flight Deck and Cabin Smoke and Fire Incidents: 2001-2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","topic":"Fire dynamics and safety research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration","keywords":"Aeronautics; Smoke; Cockpit; Deck; Environmental science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Aerospace engineering; Structural engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003063724,0.001364329,0.001764682,0.02509611,0.001404674,0.00194931,0.002378332,0.0009402059,0.004063347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009757021,0.0008276579,0.001593207,0.0372971,0.001029601,0.001274715,0.0009398584,0.001018876,0.0008913981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02024674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06240759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.845186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9312038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966087,0.0002187308,0.0008127185,0.0003194888,0.001836382,0.0002039517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770626,0.002436251,0.002854321,0.0002649215,0.01672479,0.0006571743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003390213,0.00004417391,0.01723124,0.1957121,0.0009366702,0.0009081429,0.001561139,0.000409025,0.001115453,0.0006660153,0.1521615,0.6289155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003477123,0.000128273,0.128441,0.09059249,0.002290185,0.001824957,0.001939046,0.0001071942,0.0008035385,0.0001162745,0.7735678,0.0001544223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001684844,0.989198,0.0001397673,0.0008799689,0.0003928325,0.00007783593,0.00444687,0.00002644065,0.003153366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00645728,0.9886275,0.0003005493,0.0005941966,0.0001356858,0.00003441103,0.002914053,0.00001239697,0.0009238967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.154814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3114514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01421337791578472,"score_gpt":0.2576245040493476,"score_spread":0.2434111261335628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}