{"id":"W2017161376","doi":"10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00459-0","title":"Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun–noun compounds","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Language","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Noun; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Relation (database); Head (geology); Nonsense; Cognitive psychology; Affect (linguistics); Noun phrase; Communication; Natural language processing; Cognition; Computer science; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006036071,0.00006535078,0.0001162683,0.00004164254,0.00003037158,0.00001430737,0.00005950526,0.00004163208,0.00004582377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001383402,0.00004101088,0.0000204891,0.00006410659,0.00007553394,0.00004545098,0.00001873598,0.00006923709,0.000004511757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001322533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006346859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002430278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001271215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994114,0.0001758763,0.0001534524,0.00012483,0.00007068151,0.00006375228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991182,0.0006318872,0.00007523951,0.0001439468,0.00001368685,0.00001702167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002398362,0.0004290729,0.1232148,0.0008685542,0.0002842784,0.00002090336,0.4747111,0.00004317012,0.02729994,0.0415742,0.002411318,0.3267443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002254552,0.0009453055,0.9831589,0.0003304699,0.00003226913,0.00001645788,0.002553898,0.0001421512,0.008524051,0.0008978204,0.0009689695,0.0001751948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984283,0.0001967117,0.0001328012,0.0002822373,0.00008002459,0.0001795822,0.000006140254,0.00001081081,0.01482871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994408,0.00000511535,0.00003409369,0.000193109,0.00001154382,0.000006323189,0.00001081718,0.000004457622,0.000293687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1672375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00934802636028151,"score_gpt":0.3171150907349859,"score_spread":0.3077670643747044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}