{"id":"W2017181028","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00371.x","title":"Revisiting print exposure: exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Variance (accounting); Test (biology); Literacy; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001226106,0.0003491789,0.0004023312,0.001165701,0.0002270449,0.001372177,0.0003813897,0.0005796258,0.004404895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406917,0.0003231902,0.0003500252,0.0006389466,0.0006198218,0.001124646,0.0007885945,0.0008734209,0.0008330696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001674522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002105728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001609074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002249713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993578,0.0001361332,0.00007308249,0.000155045,0.0001982343,0.0000797805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067,0.004753481,0.002500046,0.0006562378,0.0006767249,0.0007435531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931636,0.0006521487,0.9733341,0.00003686244,0.00009104262,0.0002270083,0.004895752,0.00008682998,0.004224822,0.00005419124,0.000120735,0.01598319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004646833,0.0002850248,0.998322,0.000004115221,0.00001151428,0.0001195343,0.0006242002,0.0001044207,0.0003760093,0.00006530585,0.00007882461,0.00000453443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994273,0.0000389469,0.00005183452,0.000007000022,0.000001766217,0.000006475173,0.00003511794,0.000002922756,0.0004285564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993142,0.00002892186,0.0000696724,0.00001260031,0.000004123501,0.00001031899,0.00008713246,0.000003540261,0.0004695124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004404895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01473588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2060845490291057,"score_gpt":0.4164800832950463,"score_spread":0.2103955342659407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}