{"id":"W2017223118","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.004","title":"A comparative analysis of current microbial water quality risk assessment and management practices in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canadian Water Network; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Metagenomics; Best practice; Scope (computer science); Water quality; Risk management; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Watershed management; Business; Watershed; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Political science; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028011,0.0003959379,0.0004586178,0.003956033,0.004948622,0.00329329,0.00185316,0.0004641898,0.001983023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007591817,0.0003407787,0.0004490483,0.009686399,0.001895191,0.00068099,0.001864481,0.0005878841,0.0001843052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1257448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1439164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952241,0.000382346,0.0003072078,0.0003781602,0.002515804,0.001192489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844494,0.001076513,0.001783054,0.0002786033,0.01024586,0.002166547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001861034,0.00007879423,0.8914554,0.0004487649,0.0001454562,0.0004158225,0.0257055,0.001017325,0.001290404,0.001812038,0.006255346,0.07118905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005487396,0.00003671425,0.9622956,0.0001970593,0.00004808745,0.00006554766,0.02443125,0.0007386458,0.0002440427,0.0001125067,0.01177914,0.00004604858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693903,0.003462475,0.001069259,0.003346699,0.00003146351,0.0002192159,0.003370914,0.00005012863,0.01905964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920313,0.001717176,0.0009257587,0.0002844963,0.000005321926,0.0000420052,0.001044016,0.00001731497,0.003932655],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1257448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05325119493599018,"score_gpt":0.3299727382294563,"score_spread":0.2767215432934662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}