{"id":"W2017223118","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.004","title":"A comparative analysis of current microbial water quality risk assessment and management practices in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canadian Water Network; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Metagenomics; Best practice; Scope (computer science); Water quality; Risk management; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Watershed management; Business; Watershed; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Political science; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002313629,0.0001779299,0.0008287366,0.00004391361,0.0002505439,0.0001333253,0.0006069585,0.0000385476,0.0007787184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001529557,0.0001213847,0.0001294653,0.0003474668,0.001634406,0.0001904691,0.001464876,0.0002832036,0.000003571639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001255114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001063328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9542207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970472,0.0006587131,0.0006799664,0.000517827,0.0008249537,0.0002713211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998306,0.0001136894,0.0009977337,0.0004953686,0.000006581762,0.00008057848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000239038,0.001807531,0.06147947,0.004994956,0.002553876,0.000009269741,0.009528765,0.007144367,0.0005907557,0.0001051398,0.001373465,0.9103885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000216077,0.00003713418,0.9666716,0.0004187255,0.001765953,0.000004780561,0.0003035477,0.0002719349,0.00002881201,0.00005172184,0.02992153,0.0003081455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523712,0.04554908,0.000003276917,0.00005846693,0.0001067494,0.001359603,0.00009158773,0.000002018239,0.000458036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5209981,0.4770364,0.0001915237,0.00001386127,0.000006035242,0.0001120239,0.00001615463,0.000008226267,0.001617684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.852642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05325119493599018,"score_gpt":0.3299727382294563,"score_spread":0.2767215432934662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}