{"id":"W2017324133","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2007.01.005","title":"Antilock brakes and the risk of driver injury in a crash: A case–control study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Crash; Anti-lock braking system; Poison control; Engineering; Injury prevention; Automotive engineering; Confidence interval; Human factors and ergonomics; Aeronautics; Occupational safety and health; Medicine; Forensic engineering; Medical emergency; Brake; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615938,0.001000447,0.0009942419,0.002470375,0.002099579,0.00129857,0.001282949,0.002505711,0.00349518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050511,0.001769432,0.001795872,0.001292468,0.001495562,0.001186672,0.0007406517,0.001782223,0.0005821588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007383304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000702158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01354494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007682822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981738,0.0007501926,0.0001727026,0.0003359372,0.0002481001,0.0003193263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963244,0.001576234,0.0007674896,0.0004213823,0.0004041844,0.0005062949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01281243,0.008390903,0.9711379,0.00008361876,0.0009348479,0.002002449,0.0009484998,0.000189184,0.001091149,0.0001370224,0.0002136508,0.002058341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074086,0.01447082,0.975769,0.00002488202,0.0008809958,0.003529992,0.002095718,0.001391637,0.0004135274,0.0001712333,0.0004200183,0.00009132922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994234,0.0001696534,0.00006640903,0.00001442586,0.000009067353,0.00002661637,0.00004022,0.000002697848,0.0002475347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994069,0.0001244775,0.00006633996,0.00001544404,0.00002248784,0.00003209744,0.00007643522,0.000002185759,0.0002536773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01354494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02693224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003742528151746766,"score_gpt":0.2366152279690462,"score_spread":0.2328726998172994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}