{"id":"W2017337625","doi":"10.1139/x06-036","title":"The impact of differential success of somatic embryogenesis on the outcome of clonal forestry programs. I. Initial comparison under multitrait selection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North Carolina State University","keywords":"Biology; Heritability; Selection (genetic algorithm); Somatic embryogenesis; Population; Tree breeding; Genetic variation; clone (Java method); Offspring; Genetic gain; Genetics; Biotechnology; Demography; Embryo; Ecology; Gene; Embryogenesis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457094,0.0002703977,0.0002390531,0.0003197534,0.000245929,0.0004313719,0.0003254746,0.000254263,0.0006970077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003267215,0.00008562905,0.0001973347,0.0001955564,0.0001663729,0.0002375089,0.000531105,0.0002177198,0.0001180722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004338188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002489877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001116585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002574009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999414,0.0002255681,0.00004840792,0.00007615933,0.0001517281,0.00008421752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964548,0.002254997,0.0004927192,0.0002211621,0.0002884701,0.000287941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002498626,0.0006304584,0.2183561,0.000171796,0.0002723138,0.0005945732,0.0002289195,0.04394056,0.6716769,0.000589408,0.0001303769,0.06091002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009433271,0.0129364,0.5955122,0.00002498281,0.000368138,0.0006015893,0.0003060653,0.07244342,0.3160487,0.0004332451,0.001180252,0.00005065516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987805,0.00005066349,0.0008050443,0.000006764247,0.000001323935,0.000008233654,0.00002331335,0.00001290214,0.0003112778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989095,0.00003600387,0.0006386349,0.000007891491,0.000001403272,0.00001062451,0.00008064356,0.000007059532,0.0003083369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007705927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.100888226226905,"score_gpt":0.3542165373093412,"score_spread":0.2533283110824362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}