{"id":"W2017393624","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0095890","title":"Which Models Are Appropriate for Six Subtropical Forests: Species-Area and Species-Abundance Models","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Alberta; National Dong Hwa University","keywords":"Relative abundance distribution; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Species diversity; Subtropics; Rare species; Relative species abundance; Species richness; Global biodiversity; Biology; Common species; Macroecology; Biodiversity; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005437692,0.001083819,0.00124843,0.001563631,0.0008479495,0.002289051,0.002863235,0.001924908,0.002929206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01585912,0.0004560187,0.002206685,0.001514799,0.0009305537,0.004391617,0.001132624,0.001484459,0.0008913743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001428318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01608929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01635033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998368,0.0006833546,0.00009331103,0.0004742611,0.0001601201,0.0002210312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950941,0.003199659,0.0006455056,0.000311844,0.0004301553,0.0003187572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005713715,0.0003475994,0.1183947,0.0005373828,0.0008566462,0.0006605488,0.001876113,0.7602929,0.002505005,0.05707342,0.004685264,0.05219892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005986307,0.0000926745,0.01627401,0.00008090687,0.000162685,0.0002570963,0.0006069202,0.910091,0.0002901335,0.06961545,0.002383629,0.00008561702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7105309,0.001395491,0.27552,0.002446557,0.0001583535,0.0003403099,0.001724365,0.0004891556,0.007394917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679781,0.000691084,0.02645022,0.0003323836,0.00009520624,0.0002594305,0.001178192,0.0001348385,0.002880528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01608929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0319913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04935751685055545,"score_gpt":0.2123850362523038,"score_spread":0.1630275194017484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}