{"id":"W2017397762","doi":"10.5555/2818754.2818780","title":"Symbolic model checking of product-line requirements using SAT-based methods","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Software Engineering","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Model checking; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Formal verification; Key (lock); Product (mathematics); Algorithm; Symbolic data analysis; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Reliability engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001008119,0.000282465,0.0003371365,0.0003888814,0.00003049285,0.0000718365,0.001187712,0.0000769024,0.000004545408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004715927,0.0002963191,0.00008505357,0.0003334674,0.00003663386,0.0005266122,0.0002788463,0.0002650916,0.000004234643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002896982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000273394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008145485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.94187e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980592,0.00007209656,0.0004537489,0.0004882535,0.0006051662,0.0003214926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981573,0.0003442637,0.00019131,0.0005867493,0.0005867248,0.0001336549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001167642,0.00003159986,0.0001622773,0.00002873694,0.00003334462,0.000005097168,0.0002263554,0.9595461,0.01243849,0.02133127,0.000006380502,0.006178636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212556,0.00005058953,0.00008067433,0.0001811899,0.000006833912,0.000006701453,0.00001234252,0.9486368,0.04679013,0.003587805,0.00005209053,0.0002735776],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01093788,0.00006889219,0.9866765,0.00008564805,0.001331929,0.000140784,0.000009039778,0.0006650491,0.0000842363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3331505,0.000002972029,0.6666764,0.00003464073,0.00006216636,0.00001454093,0.000005885889,0.00002368288,0.00002923365],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3222126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3360824296820287,"score_gpt":0.4339880477139365,"score_spread":0.09790561803190784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}