{"id":"W2017566989","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.021","title":"Modeling constrained destination choice for shopping: a GIS-based, time-geographic approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport Geography","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice set; Multinomial logistic regression; Computer science; TRIPS architecture; Set (abstract data type); Representation (politics); Aggregate (composite); Travel behavior; Operations research; Econometrics; Transport engineering; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002588999,0.0002032767,0.0003953699,0.0005686608,0.0004705146,0.00004583711,0.0003898689,0.000180115,0.00007856128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006984769,0.0001851949,0.0008367398,0.0007548127,0.0003561772,0.0009481768,0.000002407797,0.0002837172,8.980595e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003167921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002347201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002672475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001261373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977053,0.00008217312,0.0007600491,0.0002002623,0.0006591292,0.0005930225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983707,0.0001518867,0.0003715596,0.0001482682,0.0005741474,0.0003834501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001209522,0.0004985852,0.9941021,0.00007882131,0.00009486706,0.000001789601,0.001019571,0.002461345,0.00009887177,0.0002311588,0.00001557601,0.001276381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004897703,0.0003960268,0.9589943,0.000293195,0.001364116,0.000008188159,0.001643661,0.01746346,0.000106761,0.001695533,0.01206783,0.00106926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8409749,0.0009814833,0.1551709,0.0002916124,0.0003152594,0.0004629915,0.00003188988,0.00005898577,0.001711975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844513,0.00003427517,0.01468022,0.0001078871,0.0006275135,0.00001734081,0.00004105264,0.00001954585,0.00002088745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1434764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7552029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03379583755483817,"score_gpt":0.2953106636583628,"score_spread":0.2615148261035247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}