{"id":"W2017646898","doi":"10.1007/s10551-007-9381-9","title":"Enhancing Business Ethics: Using Cases to Teach Moral Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Philosophy of business; Curriculum; Quality of Life Research; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Moral reasoning; Publishing; Applied ethics; Business education; Sociology; Management; Business model; Pedagogy; Political science; Higher education; Engineering; Law; Medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06778827,0.0003967842,0.0008732372,0.001697921,0.001189145,0.0009622503,0.001437848,0.001088512,0.0001339379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2521716,0.0003118317,0.0002075254,0.006241729,0.0003704681,0.001641681,0.0003277723,0.004854022,0.00005032273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003965802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005099941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007691784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001351266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896572,0.0007546811,0.002805367,0.0006028522,0.005396263,0.000783662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358875,0.02608947,0.002649614,0.001004949,0.03382146,0.0005470831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003723134,0.002663914,0.1574692,0.002575038,0.0005408349,0.005083107,0.2096828,0.2471095,0.191929,0.07879967,0.01162076,0.08880302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002635007,0.0004010324,0.7350726,0.011692,0.0005536184,0.01160236,0.05485724,0.002018826,0.02339962,0.09800063,0.05655301,0.003214116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5779806,0.0004905196,0.3915962,0.02276443,0.006587804,0.0001393753,0.00000425588,0.00002935634,0.0004075406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294379,0.0002079998,0.06364141,0.003586526,0.002775308,0.000001438592,0.000002423162,0.0000609752,0.0002859994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5776033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4799429879960601,"score_gpt":0.485355398367863,"score_spread":0.0054124103718029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}