{"id":"W2017662701","doi":"10.1080/00207160212122","title":"An Efficient Method for Second Order Boundary Value Problems with Two Point Boundary Conditions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer Mathematics","topic":"Matrix Theory and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Perturbation (astronomy); Applied mathematics; Singular boundary method; Order (exchange); Coefficient matrix; Mixed boundary condition; Finite element method; Boundary element method; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008345764,0.0005897872,0.0008699872,0.0007654571,0.0006507359,0.0007508529,0.001438789,0.001544023,0.004433088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001839756,0.0005314018,0.0007064312,0.0006451123,0.0009348094,0.001193883,0.001512223,0.001797677,0.001625304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004217148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001005607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00112875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001359374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994662,0.0001450054,0.00002013778,0.00003689517,0.0002941017,0.00003771235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994583,0.0002175384,0.00003867457,0.00009722768,0.0001449454,0.00004326351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001218179,0.0001696229,0.0004026083,0.0005988235,0.00009375053,0.0003990442,0.0002981358,0.2462386,0.04263393,0.491344,0.009888477,0.2078112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004727309,0.00003821025,0.0001342127,0.00003898804,0.00001517069,0.0001573843,0.00001713539,0.9172514,0.004244614,0.05735122,0.02067453,0.0000298914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001578553,0.0001746419,0.9961715,0.0001108613,0.00009976136,0.000046004,0.00002402843,0.0001311484,0.001663555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06544145,0.0004111931,0.9205056,0.000172953,0.000112687,0.0004130045,0.0001326508,0.0003452959,0.01246511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004433088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01637678035827442,"score_gpt":0.2998546005393218,"score_spread":0.2834778201810474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}