{"id":"W2017662701","doi":"10.1080/00207160212122","title":"An Efficient Method for Second Order Boundary Value Problems with Two Point Boundary Conditions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer Mathematics","topic":"Matrix Theory and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Perturbation (astronomy); Applied mathematics; Singular boundary method; Order (exchange); Coefficient matrix; Mixed boundary condition; Finite element method; Boundary element method; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009942338,0.0002034672,0.0003154755,0.0002828059,0.0001654599,0.0006920615,0.001501486,0.00004435002,0.0001895278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002695103,0.0001555331,0.0001544215,0.0001860164,0.00008273766,0.0006955591,0.0001243381,0.0002236253,0.00001602797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007952985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001162491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.428175e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001385835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980531,0.0001097883,0.000699119,0.000227251,0.0006815186,0.0002292281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973301,0.0004451482,0.0006377782,0.0003366095,0.00109732,0.0001529908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005209176,0.002863769,0.00001868697,0.0001893293,0.0007768458,0.0002419824,0.008663213,0.1576481,0.0006240286,0.7947468,0.006601236,0.02757396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001397384,0.0005029781,0.00001486513,0.0001661545,0.0000271031,0.002226814,0.00003757135,0.8883621,0.0004919232,0.09924433,0.007331244,0.0001975619],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007130458,0.00008614829,0.9895865,0.001180125,0.001205402,0.000245231,0.00003271836,0.00005161957,0.0004818158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03981387,0.000004261694,0.9587647,0.0006174735,0.0006218627,0.00001068252,0.000005788324,0.00002134672,0.0001400277],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.730714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01637678035827442,"score_gpt":0.2998546005393218,"score_spread":0.2834778201810474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}