{"id":"W2017694486","doi":"10.1037/h0086865","title":"When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Tone (literature); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007287631,0.000573399,0.001090818,0.0002179867,0.001083318,0.0001585798,0.001647781,0.0005317117,0.01094005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003156254,0.0004137335,0.0002813794,0.000189578,0.004636861,0.0002338229,0.00003884484,0.002317879,0.0008362232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001742688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004984627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1267743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.918371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950756,0.001023618,0.0009423549,0.001094628,0.0003386634,0.001525104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954202,0.0004374478,0.0002867759,0.002099451,0.0007358022,0.001020307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000455734,0.00002724763,0.00006297404,0.0003127007,0.0000837056,0.0001031594,0.01681846,2.226426e-7,5.759023e-7,0.04995568,0.8859386,0.04665108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00132275,0.0001056719,0.0003130757,0.0004513836,0.0001544806,0.000187928,0.0007493759,0.00000165402,3.806644e-7,0.05437022,0.9418514,0.0004916178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.007899903,0.06792331,0.00000346987,0.4419367,0.002744372,0.001676214,0.0003766302,0.0001180523,0.4773214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03934067,0.1113546,0.0004248732,0.6449037,0.002550484,0.0006529337,0.0002654986,0.0001868015,0.2003205],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1933113005633622,"score_gpt":0.3676514046290817,"score_spread":0.1743401040657195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}