{"id":"W2017694486","doi":"10.1037/h0086865","title":"When reviews attack: Ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Tone (literature); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1530217,0.0007529315,0.0009857288,0.003262714,0.008363803,0.02953448,0.002207676,0.0200624,0.004760827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4349044,0.0007534723,0.0006480943,0.002396251,0.03843529,0.02338852,0.01047349,0.01301879,0.002836886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02019392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002755256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003182211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6655062,0.2552944,0.01218027,0.01024555,0.05200504,0.004768483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5455561,0.3241351,0.05247685,0.01994951,0.04613603,0.01174652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009319802,0.00003019188,0.001579657,0.0008309485,0.00008077363,0.0006520778,0.03134284,0.0002301558,0.0004255489,0.753971,0.1214722,0.08929136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004998964,0.0000704561,0.001901779,0.002084546,0.00004072968,0.001057725,0.01216698,0.0007161823,0.0005477316,0.5110031,0.4702408,0.0001199329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01047333,0.07104878,0.0496718,0.7155053,0.02495797,0.0003796781,0.00007403632,0.0003693539,0.1275197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6367877,0.03686455,0.04946315,0.1634935,0.04186293,0.001633063,0.0001003343,0.0007091393,0.06908564],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.809266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1933113005633622,"score_gpt":0.3676514046290817,"score_spread":0.1743401040657195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}