{"id":"W2017706717","doi":"10.1080/01431161.2011.559289","title":"Assessing the utility of LiDAR to differentiate among vegetation structural classes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing Letters","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Canopy; Lidar; Vegetation (pathology); Structural complexity; Ranging; Remote sensing; Metric (unit); Percentile; Field (mathematics); Forest structure; Contrast (vision); Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002244123,0.0001413764,0.0001472947,0.00003848091,0.0002386745,0.00005929062,0.0001639418,0.00004553312,0.00006760489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005185065,0.0001057671,0.0000770863,0.0002729698,0.0003159716,0.0001679471,0.00008799907,0.0001504473,0.00007605719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005025567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006293413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002489792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002124099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987976,0.0001376951,0.0002549214,0.0003004338,0.0002656209,0.0002437597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992177,0.00007173685,0.0001489881,0.000470125,0.00001570943,0.00007567576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001798906,0.00001903645,0.02881344,0.00002712172,0.00004586356,0.00001028802,0.007390028,0.0005454612,0.5061436,0.00001133368,0.001096802,0.4558791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067266,0.000006993482,0.9270875,0.00003846265,0.00002924262,0.0000106532,0.0001305268,0.05079682,0.02121603,0.0002999482,0.0001861,0.0001303886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626676,0.000003372884,0.0281775,0.0006546167,0.0001474308,0.000184179,5.009538e-7,0.00004908462,0.008115728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748737,7.797249e-7,0.02449032,0.0005475974,0.00003647314,3.001591e-8,0.00000259443,0.00001644084,0.00003207489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4313057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02640850270242466,"score_gpt":0.2594004154379713,"score_spread":0.2329919127355466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}