{"id":"W2017706717","doi":"10.1080/01431161.2011.559289","title":"Assessing the utility of LiDAR to differentiate among vegetation structural classes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing Letters","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Canopy; Lidar; Vegetation (pathology); Structural complexity; Ranging; Remote sensing; Metric (unit); Percentile; Field (mathematics); Forest structure; Contrast (vision); Environmental science; Geography; Physical geography; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172603,0.0002491425,0.0001806655,0.001346251,0.0004722317,0.000749859,0.0003741709,0.0003505734,0.0004951906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004775703,0.0001240247,0.0001041507,0.001155326,0.0003233952,0.0005229907,0.00041265,0.0002465413,0.0001867847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001265789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2672684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5554827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995505,0.0001087026,0.00002030524,0.00004720033,0.0001993645,0.00007396916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.0007667427,0.0001670624,0.00007714181,0.001078831,0.0001423649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001085631,0.00005175617,0.9078618,0.00004082783,0.0000402898,0.00003923252,0.0004960385,0.002418208,0.007107143,0.0001687313,0.0002663441,0.08140117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001333526,0.0001989352,0.9612477,0.00003990624,0.0000438859,0.00009675715,0.003156684,0.03052848,0.002850387,0.0003120216,0.001489193,0.00002264991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959258,0.0001763664,0.001885908,0.00006230887,0.000002923937,0.0000290181,0.0001936536,0.00001667919,0.001707354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919736,0.0001210604,0.007243445,0.00002396445,0.000002997809,0.00001270949,0.0001990965,0.000002284281,0.0004208739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2672684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5314254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02640850270242466,"score_gpt":0.2594004154379713,"score_spread":0.2329919127355466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}