{"id":"W2017877266","doi":"10.1002/xrs.781","title":"Semiempirical approach for standardless calibration in µ‐XRF spectrometry using capillary lenses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"X-Ray Spectrometry","topic":"X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Atomic Energy Agency; Mitacs","keywords":"Calibration; Monte Carlo method; Repeatability; Excitation; Radiation; Software; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Mass spectrometry; Materials science; Optics; Chemistry; Environmental science; Computational physics; Computer science; Physics; Mathematics; Chromatography; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00594638,0.001334051,0.0008441605,0.001471043,0.0007346229,0.001357679,0.002924638,0.0009208408,0.00294933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002614,0.001165347,0.0006394729,0.000987099,0.0006891408,0.001322881,0.001347265,0.002178471,0.001670756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001112591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002635945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001437727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002771771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967493,0.0007108803,0.0001630968,0.0003941911,0.00190962,0.00007290704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966673,0.00122491,0.0003390619,0.0006376422,0.001091759,0.00003932873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003659754,0.0005755661,0.001979231,0.001777101,0.0002512348,0.0001945196,0.0004294486,0.08929659,0.4490635,0.04855072,0.006067313,0.4014489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080377,0.0003065314,0.001217862,0.0001024028,0.00007849879,0.0002775854,0.00007611005,0.6149467,0.3493088,0.01471332,0.01870915,0.0001550353],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008988574,0.0001453911,0.9884053,0.00002696064,0.00002425286,0.0001207645,0.00009879047,0.001631865,0.0005581899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08493603,0.0002629981,0.9128637,0.00004619307,0.00001203973,0.0003186394,0.000253397,0.0003120786,0.0009949578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00594638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01972841034269484,"score_gpt":0.2873985629404811,"score_spread":0.2676701525977862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}