{"id":"W2017993165","doi":"10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.07.003","title":"Horizontal dispersion of software functional size with IFPUG and COSMIC units","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Engineering Software","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Function point; Software; Standardization; Computer science; Variable (mathematics); Dispersion (optics); Software development; Function (biology); Observational error; Software metric; Reliability engineering; Software quality; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Programming language; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002684206,0.0003620949,0.0003960746,0.003922585,0.0003715083,0.001383748,0.0007822784,0.0008638313,0.003289271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03004224,0.0002786052,0.0004480426,0.003868163,0.0009001924,0.001767164,0.0009857946,0.0008821007,0.0005488549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009700929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000358681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003975867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983214,0.0004442027,0.00008555566,0.0004235513,0.0005020945,0.0002231944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710819,0.01727824,0.003551661,0.004775772,0.002679677,0.0006327826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008662194,0.000133714,0.5907428,0.0001739571,0.0003757215,0.0004114618,0.001863907,0.1818784,0.006342968,0.05737895,0.008133112,0.1516988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003972263,0.0002519643,0.5250539,0.0001392646,0.000143146,0.0007186843,0.0009867314,0.4159484,0.008102815,0.04167894,0.006830643,0.000105743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554203,0.0005109951,0.02786093,0.0002313657,0.00005427899,0.00001851541,0.001459603,0.001131842,0.01331212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963887,0.00003177271,0.002365027,0.00001745516,0.00001744331,0.00001122536,0.0005872822,0.0001077684,0.0004733639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01419562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005946882834828772,"score_gpt":0.213804609320941,"score_spread":0.2078577264861122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}