{"id":"W2018109134","doi":"10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7","title":"Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of language; Epistemology; Philosophy education; Philosophy of biology; Economic methodology; Western philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Social philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Social epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Social relation; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008790464,0.00007591838,0.0001409103,0.00009608772,0.0003462772,0.00004577622,0.0002232272,0.00005211694,0.0004991133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542906,0.00006304034,0.00005281882,0.0000453831,0.00419037,0.000328947,0.00002836236,0.0002599243,0.00003808783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009633823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000164284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001067773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992189,0.00004082032,0.0001644921,0.0002001766,0.000215169,0.0001604543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991884,0.00005891653,0.000102217,0.0003069422,0.0002911781,0.00005234287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008408879,0.00008110204,0.0000393378,0.00002046677,0.000007012297,4.079169e-7,0.01749985,3.011254e-7,0.04898321,0.9309227,0.0002192907,0.002217925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793481,0.000230759,0.0004888875,0.00001626729,0.00004870125,0.000004202926,0.006948487,0.00003372895,0.03286642,0.7280979,0.230814,0.0002713887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.881782,0.00002077406,0.00000845554,0.006377889,0.004351932,0.0001023994,0.00001552195,0.00005817752,0.1072828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933267,0.000004199355,0.0002910247,0.00008173101,0.004778738,0.000003992382,0.000002913264,0.00001045765,0.001500219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2305947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04323880442566755,"score_gpt":0.2837371773633774,"score_spread":0.2404983729377099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}