{"id":"W2018185662","doi":"10.1002/nag.774","title":"Finite element formulation for poroelastic problem with zero effective stress boundary condition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Poromechanics; Convergence (economics); Borehole; Nonlinear system; Finite element method; Boundary value problem; Stress (linguistics); Boundary (topology); Stability (learning theory); Hydraulic fracturing; Numerical analysis; Computer simulation; Applied mathematics; Geology; Computer science; Mechanics; Mathematics; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Mathematical analysis; Structural engineering; Porous medium; Porosity; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000852548,0.0007420828,0.001062973,0.0005354094,0.0005150344,0.001006883,0.00112502,0.002702885,0.004854131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001559055,0.0005029071,0.0006213931,0.0004639606,0.000985082,0.0007535327,0.001210502,0.001161173,0.0009151458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003747885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008843922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002463473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001967634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996376,0.0001174761,0.00002143776,0.00004227591,0.0001581634,0.00002307634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994256,0.000354923,0.00004630779,0.00003241214,0.0001120705,0.00002863981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006693338,0.00006548609,0.0004444818,0.0002534139,0.00001794228,0.0003008628,0.0001929286,0.9389903,0.01054089,0.0318167,0.0009065502,0.01640349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001311062,0.00002708683,0.00005482095,0.00001225227,0.000003512355,0.00004148545,0.00002620135,0.9958425,0.0007392684,0.001874878,0.001359387,0.000005453781],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01370397,0.0002750669,0.9779178,0.0002987842,0.00006538635,0.00009620827,0.0001042328,0.0001065547,0.007431982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4585361,0.0008946584,0.5156119,0.0002211726,0.0001225088,0.0009227899,0.000399839,0.0001721174,0.02311901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004854131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01623875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01411619032841858,"score_gpt":0.3486118357745275,"score_spread":0.3344956454461089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}