{"id":"W2018336295","doi":"10.3997/1873-0604.2010033","title":"Automation of the SLUTH method: a novel approach to airborne magnetic data interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Near Surface Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Geology; Distortion (music); Regional geology; Economic geology; Geodesy; Geometry; Magnetic field; Homogeneous; Magnetic anomaly; Field (mathematics); Geophysics; Hydrogeology; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics; Statistical physics; Geotechnical engineering; Telmatology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577754,0.001284541,0.001012919,0.002680775,0.0008293865,0.002551047,0.001946669,0.0007832458,0.006065742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005929439,0.0007255261,0.001255766,0.001569924,0.000973842,0.001426651,0.002654882,0.001408455,0.003129223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004413615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00121861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003641202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004400871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975845,0.0006076106,0.0002334944,0.0004949233,0.0009584004,0.0001211295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963489,0.001363857,0.0002706265,0.000997588,0.00092889,0.00009020389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002041422,0.00009963179,0.001864345,0.0002647075,0.0001250692,0.0006805364,0.0005836184,0.03547098,0.06928773,0.01277933,0.007088635,0.8715513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006017505,0.00009462242,0.00150326,0.00004469715,0.00003878344,0.0005143495,0.0002844104,0.9147031,0.03601119,0.02472547,0.02193832,0.00008172708],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001894822,0.00001831446,0.9934223,0.00002882665,0.00001463711,0.00003810739,0.00006978893,0.004197842,0.000315426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02380682,0.00003248885,0.974615,0.00003000758,0.00002887117,0.00006855708,0.0002497787,0.0004145666,0.0007538825],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006065742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02029198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02246518001558722,"score_gpt":0.2615860066606144,"score_spread":0.2391208266450272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}