{"id":"W2018401587","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x","title":"Investment Attractiveness of Afforestation in Canada Inclusive of Carbon Sequestration Benefits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Attractiveness; Greenhouse gas; Investment (military); Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Carbon price; Business; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecology; Computer science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006118594,0.0002734812,0.0002680884,0.0004344619,0.001075984,0.00141605,0.0006322586,0.0006198845,0.003479491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00234308,0.0002247123,0.0004758702,0.0007538052,0.0006654147,0.0005729282,0.0005590333,0.0005708168,0.00007489585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02724062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01729683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9555045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995512,0.00009025507,0.000009155306,0.00003751034,0.00007807328,0.0002337429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992791,0.000251944,0.00009009756,0.00002093266,0.0002007778,0.0001572973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003682131,0.00005760514,0.06857257,0.0000447017,0.00008423135,0.000229575,0.0001124358,0.9035749,0.001042246,0.01673985,0.001651252,0.007522307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001502878,0.0001512175,0.078218,0.00003265206,0.000150012,0.00009829424,0.0008331669,0.9083099,0.0008315325,0.006162843,0.004990549,0.00007149245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979243,0.0001918821,0.001063781,0.0007475475,0.000007542128,0.00003565829,0.0007940863,0.00002276672,0.01789376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975696,0.0001381484,0.0005682988,0.00004044989,0.000001074038,0.000006434208,0.0002000503,0.000003336377,0.001472598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04449552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1976454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01224356877463343,"score_gpt":0.1642128317714783,"score_spread":0.1519692629968449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}