{"id":"W2018401587","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x","title":"Investment Attractiveness of Afforestation in Canada Inclusive of Carbon Sequestration Benefits","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Attractiveness; Greenhouse gas; Investment (military); Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Carbon price; Business; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecology; Computer science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002199051,0.0001759854,0.0003769809,0.0001932602,0.00004559751,0.00001600406,0.0003193167,0.00006061749,0.0002785368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003228491,0.0001659899,0.00007704466,0.0001526361,0.00009260145,0.0005184455,0.00002770072,0.0001317834,0.000006007062],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00783205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001356592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985356,0.00003308635,0.0008401137,0.0001764369,0.00002650313,0.0003882369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984053,0.00004924268,0.0008519828,0.0001319264,0.00004707939,0.0005144381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004474678,0.00002541597,0.2388232,0.00004482812,0.0000820774,0.00002289957,0.002450527,0.7371885,0.0002726458,0.01502266,0.001006664,0.005015892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000667021,0.000206447,0.9907048,0.00008485427,0.00003832806,0.00004933955,0.0009624168,0.001418637,0.001181201,0.0007418556,0.003627402,0.0003177515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933379,0.00006556976,2.202183e-7,0.001271163,0.0002692827,0.0002017086,0.00007443628,0.000001036141,0.004778729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999383,0.00003667023,0.0001139045,0.0001621846,0.0001304426,0.000004521713,0.00002575723,0.000009366708,0.0001341064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7518816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01224356877463343,"score_gpt":0.1642128317714783,"score_spread":0.1519692629968449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}