{"id":"W2018536683","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-842x.2010.00584.x","title":"SAMPLING AND ESTIMATION IN THE PRESENCE OF CUT‐OFF SAMPLING","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Estimator; Sampling bias; Sampling design; Sample (material); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sample size determination; Calibration; Set (abstract data type); Population; Selection bias; Probability sampling; Cluster sampling; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05130112,0.0009048665,0.002510368,0.001793532,0.000930036,0.002965835,0.002792735,0.00310151,0.002745806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2220154,0.001218326,0.001426615,0.002645275,0.002207148,0.003117758,0.002481068,0.003033643,0.0004933394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001417587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001518724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004262003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002290598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9506046,0.04100144,0.001612219,0.002556312,0.003289424,0.000936046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479185,0.1253742,0.00596465,0.01569524,0.004417014,0.0006305359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001251854,0.0002898608,0.05313778,0.0008509033,0.0007566571,0.001814982,0.001197857,0.1632943,0.001217304,0.6054003,0.007208436,0.1635799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003105536,0.0003615708,0.008859116,0.0002780397,0.0002381701,0.0004962433,0.0002043864,0.5990455,0.001083584,0.3806609,0.008397819,0.0000640971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03084194,0.0007082454,0.964686,0.0005387299,0.0001312006,0.0003037701,0.000240898,0.000192906,0.002356226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.543426,0.0006788867,0.4502513,0.0004560262,0.0002147547,0.001249136,0.001084744,0.00005083031,0.002588348],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05130112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2713095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1095235073761838,"score_gpt":0.2850730236934445,"score_spread":0.1755495163172607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}