{"id":"W2018883494","doi":"10.1090/s0002-9947-2014-06134-5","title":"On the consistency of the combinatorial codifferential","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the American Mathematical Society","topic":"Topological and Geometric Data Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Counterexample; Subdivision; Triangulation; Piecewise; Consistency (knowledge bases); Operator (biology); Combinatorial method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003752284,0.0001004681,0.0002940821,0.0000151073,0.0002770021,0.00002264929,0.001620511,0.00002996419,0.0001269162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002325309,0.00003920256,0.000692412,0.001151208,0.001254593,0.00003956406,0.00008824039,0.0002063628,0.000009827618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001450558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002305709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005721764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001430451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987566,0.0002194768,0.0002819757,0.0001559115,0.0004368167,0.0001492407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972521,0.001405388,0.0002657762,0.0009832651,0.00005710391,0.00003635502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005928105,0.0004236034,0.00005505991,0.00001875304,0.0001483434,2.13602e-8,0.0003445981,0.00009680598,0.000327878,0.9936547,0.0007915465,0.004132756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000537678,0.0003886297,0.007413709,0.00005355352,0.0003328218,0.000004823401,0.0004982283,0.04021455,0.006400846,0.9433357,0.0005845455,0.0002348853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1460997,0.000005094971,0.8439069,0.008133682,0.0002339634,0.0001631221,0.00001866085,0.00002787247,0.00141093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969923,0.000004766619,0.002468767,0.0003996297,0.00001466663,0.00000778593,1.624503e-7,0.000003167994,0.0001087558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8508926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01252767705811088,"score_gpt":0.2300144946948429,"score_spread":0.217486817636732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}