{"id":"W2018921992","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.07.006","title":"Long-horizon regression tests of the theory of purchasing power parity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing power parity; Relative purchasing power parity; Economics; Econometrics; Parity (physics); Horizon; Regression; Regression analysis; Time horizon; Regression testing; Seemingly unrelated regressions; Exchange rate; Statistics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001887464,0.0001324541,0.0005376337,0.0001526072,0.00008538577,0.00001662698,0.0003393053,0.00009675799,0.0002046026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005048187,0.0001041533,0.0002770302,0.0001831751,0.0001169064,0.0002825683,0.00003758131,0.0002904088,0.000008543526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007600914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004672751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002077284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002714852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984127,0.00006742037,0.001086279,0.0001459144,0.00005866959,0.0002290169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970232,0.000145798,0.00240194,0.0003555772,0.00003940592,0.00003407159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002455841,0.0002941085,0.6857935,0.0001315249,0.0001779615,0.00001482612,0.002001671,0.004958744,0.001137351,0.2956709,0.001223649,0.008350166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001156963,0.0005013481,0.7137377,0.0007630353,0.00002736852,0.0001535414,0.00006705359,0.0002359242,0.01260186,0.2583401,0.01210982,0.0003052867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851883,0.004229347,0.001262828,0.0002005366,0.0007382469,0.00007032778,0.00001922834,0.000002400251,0.008288807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984918,0.0003419813,0.0007874375,0.00005363459,0.00007704817,5.081584e-7,2.311186e-7,0.00001416664,0.0002332457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03733085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4247249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04407543526381485,"score_gpt":0.2401452758596324,"score_spread":0.1960698405958175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}