{"id":"W2019223278","doi":"10.1177/0951629810375643","title":"Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Social welfare function; Index (typography); Representation (politics); Welfare; Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Economics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Logarithm; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Market economy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361029,0.00006598681,0.0001500617,0.00002759082,0.0006505417,0.00006272288,0.0002253404,0.00008583131,0.0001851134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00125957,0.00003147272,0.00009729611,0.0001938441,0.001513076,0.000108874,0.00001794038,0.0003877605,0.000002163305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004013584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001619992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000390541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002183328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979324,0.0006603922,0.0003603269,0.00006241485,0.0007307506,0.0002536713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.0007170282,0.0003460516,0.0001159178,0.0006495268,0.00009352565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005760265,0.00002756816,0.001169905,0.000006980173,0.00002345688,5.011819e-7,0.002288455,0.00001469774,0.0008162635,0.9948701,0.0001796793,0.0005447883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006682417,0.001038922,0.03509419,0.00003824035,0.0004092061,0.0000203852,0.008583631,0.000542454,0.001595155,0.9455868,0.006252784,0.0001699937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349622,0.000007573738,0.0006427512,0.05958202,0.0004284779,0.0001319718,0.000002445895,0.000006143724,0.004236394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981676,3.920512e-7,0.00007473862,0.0001862979,0.001470409,0.000002853825,5.15915e-7,0.00000723421,0.00008991426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06320542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5574992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05754395389845783,"score_gpt":0.4239780069297339,"score_spread":0.3664340530312761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}