{"id":"W2019223278","doi":"10.1177/0951629810375643","title":"Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Social welfare function; Index (typography); Representation (politics); Welfare; Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Economics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Logarithm; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Market economy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01322333,0.0009215728,0.001245201,0.002802784,0.000829311,0.002556098,0.001090078,0.0009469236,0.002525825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03012294,0.0002620844,0.0005792864,0.002180454,0.003135828,0.003270819,0.002285164,0.001014513,0.0001448511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001751537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002224341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001815704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935222,0.003943386,0.0002296999,0.0003627788,0.001419459,0.0005224732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870907,0.008980065,0.001250555,0.0009798476,0.001253605,0.000445036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002868792,0.0001945464,0.01231123,0.0001059007,0.0001928755,0.000140272,0.0005042762,0.5652199,0.001877871,0.3617722,0.001330917,0.05606311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001737126,0.00016253,0.004302559,0.00003054082,0.00003236779,0.00006209328,0.0004314533,0.8109188,0.002002472,0.1809001,0.001091527,0.00004819586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3298694,0.0002300875,0.6465952,0.0006439979,0.00004769903,0.0001693072,0.0001605915,0.00009220502,0.02219155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366423,0.0001289691,0.06052765,0.00003899166,0.00003193046,0.0001658311,0.00009499034,0.00004266884,0.002326557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01322333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06993252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05754395389845783,"score_gpt":0.4239780069297339,"score_spread":0.3664340530312761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}