{"id":"W2019374133","doi":"10.3138/tjt.1988","title":"Religion and Rationality: A Semeiotic Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Semiotics; Ecological rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Object (grammar); Philosophy; Section (typography); Generality; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003478917,0.0003276577,0.0003630601,0.002830622,0.002866191,0.005882741,0.0008661675,0.001620872,0.00313762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002505953,0.0001948943,0.0004143402,0.001466043,0.03037976,0.004183652,0.002924559,0.002187286,0.0003595707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005352894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002554815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002616638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002615176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996262,0.002631609,0.000118029,0.0002049064,0.0005825319,0.0002009167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976398,0.001457831,0.0001659837,0.0001921776,0.0004033664,0.0001408651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002408532,0.000002585274,0.00005339694,0.000008782161,0.00000108203,0.000016935,0.0008190736,0.0001059994,0.00001824819,0.9979821,0.0001584596,0.0008309472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006845022,0.000006261805,0.0001533549,0.00004067492,0.000003076071,0.0000495407,0.001250546,0.0008509888,0.00009293231,0.9799318,0.01761044,0.000003520503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05578807,0.00726683,0.1497221,0.02314385,0.0005188518,0.00005413219,0.0000818595,0.00006978542,0.7633545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970728,0.001447704,0.01739991,0.0007557588,0.0002126653,0.00004915113,0.00003159192,0.00002102682,0.009354154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005882741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03883821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02448394205958735,"score_gpt":0.2309772391668009,"score_spread":0.2064932971072135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}