{"id":"W2019374133","doi":"10.3138/tjt.1988","title":"Religion and Rationality: A Semeiotic Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Semiotics; Ecological rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Object (grammar); Philosophy; Section (typography); Generality; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001868378,0.00007183863,0.0001676154,0.00002624353,0.0001069785,0.000042075,0.00009088244,0.00003416939,0.001091506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002451976,0.00005063026,0.00005457921,0.00000448004,0.0001632243,0.0002809486,0.00002191792,0.00007871131,0.0000191341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002314514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000135838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008515242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001301758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994493,0.00007475608,0.0002189215,0.00006664706,0.00009702954,0.00009338078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999503,0.00007412313,0.00016251,0.00006620129,0.0001456724,0.00004853568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004059819,0.0000519373,0.0003277043,0.00001204007,0.00006053897,0.00000189475,0.006714327,0.000002945671,0.00002793777,0.9801016,0.0111564,0.001502035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009812218,0.0007582145,0.002702968,0.00002516334,0.00007402277,0.0003315393,0.001798746,0.0001565746,0.0000133108,0.9108466,0.08212744,0.00018423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2905614,0.01646074,0.0004787132,0.004774155,0.001123719,0.0002424594,0.000002291693,0.00002237209,0.6863342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961196,0.0004322374,0.0003316072,0.0005711245,0.0009187969,0.00000252267,9.88207e-7,0.000005226346,0.00161794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7055582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02448394205958735,"score_gpt":0.2309772391668009,"score_spread":0.2064932971072135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}