{"id":"W2019381611","doi":"10.1007/s10811-005-9001-y","title":"Assessing scales of variability in benthic diatom community structure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Phycology","topic":"Diatoms and Algae Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Ministry of Environment; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Community structure; Benthic zone; Replicate; Diatom; Sampling (signal processing); STREAMS; Ecology; Community; Spatial variability; Environmental science; Sampling design; Biology; Habitat; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125056,0.0001826713,0.0002483747,0.0007356398,0.0003085707,0.0007596043,0.0003431188,0.0004524556,0.0005252102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006192647,0.0002674311,0.0002660699,0.000430862,0.000386481,0.0008570073,0.0008368192,0.000464472,0.00008376567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003114437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000159318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00249787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005005929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995301,0.0001225076,0.00003535511,0.0001602882,0.0000962755,0.00005552986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942912,0.003768875,0.0009265827,0.000368547,0.000353378,0.0002915391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004800686,0.0001005888,0.9397257,0.0000342861,0.0002259008,0.0001080473,0.0005506396,0.002719516,0.03900155,0.0002028688,0.00008624697,0.01676465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006504692,0.0001167152,0.992141,0.000002308528,0.00002735798,0.0000482951,0.0001759676,0.005825685,0.001408228,0.0001814387,0.00005796639,0.000008447732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998787,0.00002363479,0.0008616821,0.000006136268,0.000001079189,0.000005974922,0.0000393875,0.000007451669,0.0002676909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.000007523881,0.0006556976,0.00000362486,0.000001675508,0.000005767539,0.00004366421,0.000002223847,0.0000445314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00249787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006613672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02330449557324297,"score_gpt":0.3280155836630106,"score_spread":0.3047110880897677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}