{"id":"W2019406184","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012024","title":"Overcoming the Invisibility of Metrology: A Reading Measurement Network for Education and the Social Sciences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Reading (process); Metrology; Traceability; Quality (philosophy); Behavioural sciences; Social science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Epistemology; Physics; Law; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001448522,0.0000648331,0.0001847661,0.00001606949,0.0003399082,0.00006594336,0.0001625082,0.00002589115,0.00002785791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002640408,0.00003278488,0.0000592641,0.0001194507,0.0007163819,0.0002236087,0.00002651665,0.0001388261,8.39933e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000979467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001888562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000557415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009440332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991929,0.000214434,0.0002247945,0.00008016394,0.0001713352,0.0001163734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982768,0.000316308,0.000459514,0.00004923409,0.0008851468,0.00001298738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005116106,0.0001519114,0.01163511,0.00006856825,0.0002197632,7.523927e-8,0.02237772,0.00001276171,0.001342046,0.5973106,0.001743242,0.3646266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011994,0.0008934134,0.1040783,0.0001641999,0.0001993598,0.0000168461,0.04372835,0.00006839741,0.003687403,0.8444314,0.001391436,0.0001415057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730097,0.0008275763,0.01439061,0.008265228,0.0005025246,0.0003394059,0.000001891664,0.000004958174,0.002658105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989233,0.0000157673,0.0002756169,0.0002894251,0.0004121483,0.00002542193,1.92911e-7,0.000003049416,0.00005505706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3644851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2639539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09790179006467739,"score_gpt":0.3767695491477704,"score_spread":0.278867759083093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}