{"id":"W2019409007","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.033","title":"In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","topic":"Dental Erosion and Treatment","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polishing; Materials science; Surface roughness; Enamel paint; Scanning electron microscope; Profilometer; Carbide; Aluminum oxide; Surface finish; Bracket; Composite material; Dentistry; Metallurgy; Aluminium; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005169991,0.0003583606,0.0003392783,0.0001996105,0.0003067071,0.0002207227,0.0002018348,0.0006148099,0.002341358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000731813,0.0004288811,0.0005389754,0.0001755547,0.0003876902,0.0004502345,0.0002164683,0.000743659,0.0003195568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001135172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001394962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008463649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001642255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997253,0.0000598654,0.00002419332,0.00005588308,0.0000841389,0.00005064833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993644,0.0002608217,0.00009474305,0.00008914676,0.0001485477,0.00004235394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001946639,0.0002991998,0.001596531,0.00004726427,0.00002147105,0.00007692431,0.0001452198,0.00009067633,0.9930463,0.00002263191,0.0000343629,0.0026728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133896,0.00763808,0.1268329,0.000009581106,0.0001923349,0.0007401651,0.0006194543,0.002299647,0.8600602,0.00009409955,0.001339495,0.00004017856],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982705,0.0001958945,0.001087245,0.00001163727,0.00001804839,0.00002124107,0.00006044407,0.000009796731,0.0003251678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962482,0.0001659102,0.001620731,0.00002537112,0.00001079304,0.00003216626,0.0001201246,0.00001307243,0.001763626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002341358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007832646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02431717532512749,"score_gpt":0.3106779160347147,"score_spread":0.2863607407095872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}