{"id":"W2019442847","doi":"10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00037-7","title":"Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gait & Posture","topic":"Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":366,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Kinematics; Sagittal plane; Center of mass (relativistic); Physics; Geodesy; Ankle; Inverted pendulum; Angular velocity; Angular displacement; Biomechanics; Trunk; Center of pressure (fluid mechanics); Geometry; Anatomy; Geology; Mathematics; Medicine; Mechanics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001838561,0.0005862187,0.0005649985,0.0007590764,0.0005149262,0.00129147,0.0006301897,0.0007002458,0.002246921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081376,0.0004590267,0.000484365,0.0003343758,0.0006279351,0.0008675986,0.000627831,0.0004351325,0.000675192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003501754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009155488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01662979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006380695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.000195619,0.00002966118,0.00008064973,0.00008808152,0.0000702146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998704,0.0007081296,0.0001188702,0.0001445043,0.0002781971,0.00004634784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002139241,0.0007668842,0.06061942,0.0003209957,0.0006081592,0.0007858513,0.0006966218,0.8085231,0.01237122,0.02675688,0.002297321,0.08411425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004916846,0.0001835698,0.0163675,0.00003398655,0.00005267776,0.0001006624,0.0001096355,0.9771773,0.0004412893,0.005115808,0.0003468448,0.00002148388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8451062,0.0004476503,0.1403651,0.0004978818,0.0001767585,0.0001300206,0.0004874165,0.0002472914,0.01254159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973089,0.00006768714,0.001752511,0.00001302294,0.00001072649,0.00002554667,0.0001461129,0.00001260867,0.0006629343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01662979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03306597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04563057043899345,"score_gpt":0.3377511474175286,"score_spread":0.2921205769785352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}