{"id":"W2019489595","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.09.007","title":"Economic performance assessment of advanced process control with LQG benchmarking","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Benchmark (surveying); Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Control (management); Process (computing); Control engineering; Control system; Computer science; Engineering; Optimal control; Process control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003081831,0.0002275478,0.0007102724,0.0001952153,0.00009023804,0.00002356408,0.0002493483,0.00007838778,0.00003922134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001602912,0.0001774482,0.000121664,0.0001324155,0.00005367691,0.0005716124,0.000003150306,0.0003321686,0.000002895065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002651624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000244123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008534436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983376,0.00003345358,0.0008384568,0.0001364944,0.0003724497,0.0002815536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998702,0.00007254312,0.00062235,0.0001404179,0.0003353228,0.0001272877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005588827,0.00005540038,0.03721411,0.0004530311,0.000395028,0.00002700244,0.0003570225,0.9494011,0.003419521,0.00001397393,0.0000390687,0.008065896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0165907,0.001335404,0.02455967,0.0004696088,0.0001504864,0.0008198958,0.0003713174,0.9517853,0.002812856,0.00001590433,0.000687629,0.0004012594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798679,0.0005712612,0.01723485,0.00005232399,0.0004824848,0.0003396872,0.000008441013,0.00005279418,0.001390271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992621,0.0000892746,0.0001666932,0.00004309702,0.0003352155,0.00004369186,4.915317e-7,0.00003554743,0.00002388662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01939421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7236127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004124205565409701,"score_gpt":0.2261322824352743,"score_spread":0.2220080768698645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}