{"id":"W2019489595","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.09.007","title":"Economic performance assessment of advanced process control with LQG benchmarking","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Benchmark (surveying); Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Control (management); Process (computing); Control engineering; Control system; Computer science; Engineering; Optimal control; Process control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02185948,0.001022672,0.001918689,0.002312145,0.0006005233,0.002947939,0.001399361,0.002054793,0.001765144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03714023,0.0003578861,0.0009471434,0.002211294,0.001442066,0.00264823,0.001869769,0.0011576,0.000170295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003377336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002131588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005080541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868259,0.009401435,0.0002694254,0.0005621046,0.002160271,0.0007808772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790609,0.01458791,0.001053183,0.00159695,0.003188607,0.0005123155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002406601,0.0002506245,0.006099649,0.0001542139,0.0001416839,0.0001072825,0.00003198151,0.9309713,0.0007974306,0.02628307,0.0007669675,0.03198924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001096321,0.0008655199,0.005093642,0.00002598798,0.00006033173,0.00003185207,0.00004709142,0.981669,0.001003638,0.01055355,0.0005108859,0.00002892894],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.786789,0.002821042,0.1818545,0.001890915,0.0002514957,0.0003336267,0.0006718751,0.0002840845,0.02510362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954292,0.0001029186,0.003808734,0.00001948796,0.0000272062,0.00002829078,0.0001231725,0.00001261146,0.0004484883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02185948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1156054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004124205565409701,"score_gpt":0.2261322824352743,"score_spread":0.2220080768698645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}