{"id":"W2019535375","doi":"10.1080/15325000490441354","title":"Adequacy Assessment of Composite Power Systems with FACTS Devices Using a DC Load Flow Method","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electric Power Components and Systems","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Power flow; Transmission system; Electric power system; Power transmission; Computer science; Composite number; Transmission (telecommunications); Flexible AC transmission system; Power (physics); Engineering; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002704,0.0005840948,0.0004764929,0.002966677,0.0002949214,0.0008924089,0.0003886627,0.0004201,0.001770928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008165643,0.0002383351,0.0003388991,0.0009485584,0.0004337119,0.001275619,0.000404268,0.0004365726,0.0002152591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004160824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004712689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00276868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003923992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987488,0.0005422595,0.00007155549,0.00009416096,0.0005046973,0.00003847612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955673,0.002865137,0.0003289643,0.0002086441,0.0009422253,0.00008778579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001353595,0.0002525356,0.02161776,0.0002414761,0.0001310108,0.0003946602,0.0003019058,0.7452454,0.01027058,0.01797073,0.001147856,0.2010725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002597311,0.0001472927,0.003130115,0.000009130384,0.00001717189,0.00003963899,0.00003288488,0.9918528,0.00147432,0.002688418,0.0005711613,0.00001110462],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3183018,0.0001808565,0.6724396,0.00006969137,0.00002317957,0.0002572604,0.0002384123,0.0004508812,0.00803829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473572,0.00006338335,0.05156616,0.000007753083,0.00001539079,0.00007121768,0.000143189,0.00002610206,0.0007496802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002966677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01059145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0155039007397673,"score_gpt":0.2541251590301704,"score_spread":0.2386212582904031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}