{"id":"W2019668159","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2012.07.010","title":"A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Medical Therapy in Stable Angina Pectoris","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Conventional PCI; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Angina; Myocardial infarction; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Unstable angina; Clinical trial; MEDLINE; Cardiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01463004,0.003754916,0.02413249,0.00386212,0.0007793798,0.002992475,0.002321044,0.002680895,0.004666578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04091328,0.001879915,0.03734812,0.004302318,0.0008571596,0.001898394,0.001514009,0.002917077,0.0003753481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002751265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002404456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006063005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866624,0.007335399,0.003464444,0.001163076,0.0009993314,0.0003753405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808077,0.01505021,0.002380705,0.0006412895,0.0008552112,0.0002648289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0128463,0.00004155171,0.00162269,0.1457997,0.8309556,0.0001143029,0.00005824819,0.0004031932,0.000226797,0.0000952448,0.0004375148,0.007398879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003647812,0.0002743117,0.001329264,0.00486774,0.9888849,0.0000559755,0.00002501358,0.0001011531,0.00005889182,0.0001427746,0.0005959889,0.00001608831],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01519825,0.980993,0.001427492,0.0002762889,0.000433908,0.0006132144,0.0005767449,0.00007110142,0.0004098275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3623714,0.6248872,0.006723126,0.00183591,0.0005604986,0.001485694,0.00116049,0.0000782086,0.0008974869],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02413249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07737201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1679984462514328,"score_gpt":0.3761224823699063,"score_spread":0.2081240361184735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}