{"id":"W2019668159","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2012.07.010","title":"A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Medical Therapy in Stable Angina Pectoris","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Conventional PCI; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Angina; Myocardial infarction; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Unstable angina; Clinical trial; MEDLINE; Cardiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01366524,0.0004046223,0.0416897,0.00275926,0.00003266548,0.00001723217,0.0002563583,0.0004149455,0.002046271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004796098,0.000214506,0.02284105,0.0005799216,0.000260985,0.00005100818,0.0000153187,0.0007128149,0.000002241118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003438574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002426517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002199968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006610338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893029,0.00535561,0.004331315,0.0002020202,0.000424879,0.0003833054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885747,0.006983769,0.002933082,0.0003233214,0.0005420828,0.0006430592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02415526,0.00006076949,0.001072738,0.0009765276,0.8983176,0.003241216,0.0001093165,0.0001907161,1.037794e-7,0.0001070177,0.0002486604,0.07152008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07349149,0.0007448181,0.000127937,0.002371905,0.8290289,0.007383425,0.00007221165,0.00002592502,6.269098e-8,0.0000108068,0.08656708,0.0001754212],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000688467,0.9953746,0.001183618,0.0000933156,0.0004238817,0.001590102,0.00009493388,0.000003030758,0.0005480502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1629741,0.8362091,0.00007438005,0.00002232348,0.0003540079,0.00009195918,0.0001166079,0.00002941235,0.0001280641],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1622856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1679984462514328,"score_gpt":0.3761224823699063,"score_spread":0.2081240361184735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}