{"id":"W2019895519","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000006249","title":"Similarity assessment in a case‐based reasoning framework for building envelope design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logistics Information Management","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Envelope (radar); Building envelope; Similarity (geometry); Process (computing); Case-based reasoning; Building design; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Engineering; Systems engineering; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Architectural engineering; Mathematics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006655684,0.0007826903,0.0008676333,0.006262479,0.001439063,0.004311176,0.003256171,0.001851027,0.00332547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715348,0.000661827,0.001775599,0.003742315,0.002659382,0.004425795,0.002690102,0.001096488,0.0004339253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002637111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001863644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005950138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006649665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929975,0.003733168,0.0007256808,0.000473817,0.001861724,0.0002081752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953998,0.003014958,0.0003592528,0.00046658,0.0006066649,0.0001526647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003781,0.0004724595,0.002366514,0.0004910429,0.0001836851,0.001408432,0.002906235,0.1801749,0.003161141,0.5793363,0.002966793,0.2263322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112275,0.0001194359,0.0008673113,0.0001889751,0.0001374046,0.0006747211,0.0009837045,0.6357923,0.002745929,0.3426606,0.0156406,0.0000767459],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01017302,0.00024252,0.9848377,0.0002748607,0.00001631487,0.0003499069,0.00005929547,0.0001587167,0.003887766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1225806,0.0001531009,0.8759331,0.00003883024,0.00001620909,0.0003142591,0.0001968972,0.00001429482,0.0007526096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006655684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03519899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05969551920370992,"score_gpt":0.3281919326981336,"score_spread":0.2684964134944237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}