{"id":"W2019919882","doi":"10.4102/aej.v1i1.43","title":"Participatory evaluation for development: Examining research-based knowledge from within the African context","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Evaluation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Context (archaeology); Empowerment; Thematic analysis; Participatory development; Citizen journalism; Relevance (law); Participatory action research; Sociology; Participatory evaluation; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Qualitative research; Social science; Geography; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2891359,0.00140088,0.003020417,0.02102187,0.009839561,0.02006662,0.003518993,0.005209007,0.003074911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2777594,0.001211174,0.001422024,0.01640489,0.03228031,0.0241674,0.01871352,0.004372686,0.0003121518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01936601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05237007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003076291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004165882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5991241,0.3624173,0.01270928,0.005915559,0.01615252,0.003681142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.409599,0.5448314,0.0141551,0.01234171,0.016292,0.002780667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001376526,0.0003529175,0.008158226,0.04116149,0.0004349039,0.001398865,0.4673991,0.001269971,0.001132552,0.1737051,0.004620464,0.3002288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001191044,0.0005846697,0.006564172,0.1066986,0.0004103364,0.001157127,0.5438666,0.00142592,0.001824261,0.1842362,0.1529567,0.0001564383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1856406,0.2739486,0.2487999,0.1462288,0.003266277,0.01423107,0.0006435327,0.0001902625,0.1270508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8135375,0.05842759,0.11233,0.005461321,0.0004294814,0.008339843,0.0001590242,0.00006892533,0.001246259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2891359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.876622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7823683775505966,"score_gpt":0.5926367515141084,"score_spread":0.1897316260364882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}