{"id":"W2019947268","doi":"10.1007/s10818-010-9088-3","title":"Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioeconomics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bioeconomics; Fishing; Fishery; Revenue; Gross output; Production (economics); Economic impact analysis; Economics; Value (mathematics); Fisheries management; Natural resource economics; Geography; Business; Agricultural economics; Finance; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004879457,0.0000607318,0.0001351037,0.0000321542,0.00002766252,0.0000390915,0.0003913034,0.00005014921,0.003811132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000309428,0.00004219244,0.0001361255,0.00005753081,0.0001154153,0.0002728207,0.00007784105,0.0002263567,0.0000197448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003159791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006943878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001294572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004454602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993458,0.00002608412,0.0003623978,0.00006620833,0.00006744634,0.000132021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995181,0.00003659634,0.0002169134,0.0001642003,0.000005805684,0.00005835975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002475028,0.00003016419,0.9876883,0.000001000171,0.000008417112,0.000002754683,0.00006730641,0.0009560621,0.00004334971,0.0001389601,0.006477794,0.004561133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002502516,0.0001323173,0.9855551,9.712193e-7,0.000004338086,0.00007066918,0.0000878159,0.001002446,0.00001272111,0.00175035,0.01107715,0.00005589335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637962,0.000001088116,0.000004138506,0.0006509013,0.0001634645,0.00004927167,0.00002235029,9.400739e-7,0.03531167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.00001900551,0.0002999092,0.0001043203,0.00009146553,2.607695e-7,0.000001820461,0.000003549477,0.000042268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03564122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02219659595722477,"score_gpt":0.3066659032380458,"score_spread":0.284469307280821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}