{"id":"W2019968234","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.048","title":"Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: How common are false positive and false negative results?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Medicine; Sample size determination; Cochrane Library; Spurious relationship; False positives and false negatives; Confidence interval; Systematic review; False positive paradox; Randomized controlled trial; Random effects model; Publication bias; Statistics; Cochrane collaboration; Relative risk; MEDLINE; Study heterogeneity; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5358031,0.004467018,0.02076999,0.00891729,0.001601335,0.008122031,0.008364111,0.01350139,0.003637378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7581116,0.004664742,0.03281086,0.007887114,0.007133067,0.01009532,0.00479544,0.01055473,0.0007417193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002734892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003159525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002807562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005283892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3006179,0.5281477,0.09503677,0.03524883,0.03933955,0.001609268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09360054,0.8503729,0.0265153,0.02227959,0.006678333,0.0005532529],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00543587,0.0001936344,0.05569864,0.1259992,0.5685229,0.002082372,0.002351199,0.005554049,0.0004649565,0.01716986,0.01906202,0.1974652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009233944,0.002156829,0.06218001,0.08484197,0.6143079,0.006057704,0.001432191,0.03135988,0.002541133,0.1402169,0.04406475,0.00160676],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01287837,0.7986762,0.1610007,0.0116887,0.009315083,0.001647013,0.001671965,0.0006991588,0.002422879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5861985,0.1613958,0.1942777,0.03364322,0.01278949,0.006114427,0.002062512,0.0008625236,0.002655762],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4641969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5724374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8002018624808636,"score_gpt":0.5694367579334566,"score_spread":0.230765104547407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}