{"id":"W2020020671","doi":"10.1111/j.0022-4367.2004.00104.x","title":"Overcompensation as a Partial Solution to Commitment and Renegotiation Problems: The Case of Ex Post Moral Hazard","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Moral hazard; Principal (computer security); Economic rent; Incentive; Indemnity; Audit; Actuarial science; Private information retrieval; Payment; Economics; State (computer science); Business; Welfare; Microeconomics; Accident (philosophy); Finance; Computer science; Computer security; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01330645,0.001609285,0.003195638,0.0009720784,0.001847115,0.005261564,0.003955097,0.006925295,0.01122674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0414546,0.001618214,0.001951848,0.001445787,0.004633688,0.008527788,0.005703871,0.00644569,0.0007257427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002172019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003864871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001573749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00114831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908742,0.00558581,0.0004554034,0.001067203,0.0008335871,0.00118383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955268,0.03093475,0.004679226,0.005460166,0.001481434,0.002176392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004734026,0.0002556309,0.001030856,0.0003069051,0.0001739813,0.0007919256,0.0006230727,0.1378866,0.0009422767,0.8356653,0.002452506,0.01939746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002482112,0.0001627227,0.0003185761,0.00006149268,0.00003606202,0.0003149126,0.0001728402,0.1925602,0.0003827212,0.8033847,0.00230644,0.00005115182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2213236,0.0007352374,0.7291295,0.007522217,0.0001281364,0.0004187383,0.0004770149,0.0003969955,0.03986853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042041,0.0004543179,0.07808837,0.0005095097,0.0001383736,0.0004816478,0.0001979636,0.0001056732,0.0158199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01330645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0703721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04141327955641869,"score_gpt":0.336224629825501,"score_spread":0.2948113502690823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}