{"id":"W2020209089","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550360204","title":"Likelihood and bayesian approaches to inference for the stationary point of a quadratic response surface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Stationary point; Bayesian inference; Parametrization (atmospheric modeling); Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Inference; Quadratic equation; Polynomial; Quadratic function; Point estimation; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003866382,0.0001029873,0.0002698316,0.0002388152,0.0002180886,0.00008162894,0.0004086573,0.00003580549,0.00006768001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01159906,0.00006990624,0.00004455383,0.0003384725,0.0002903981,0.0001583819,0.00002003915,0.0001125317,0.000003449372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007615745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002008269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000540375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001553171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980258,0.0004233794,0.0007021328,0.0001415819,0.0004929369,0.000214146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885907,0.009777216,0.0003596734,0.0002123412,0.0005073318,0.0005527075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009860446,0.0004011949,0.09547886,0.0001832957,0.0006546997,0.0015615,0.1986147,0.05848989,0.02638643,0.1357484,0.2096283,0.2629923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003986933,0.009348725,0.4578767,0.0002849731,0.0002277484,0.001875829,0.05658402,0.1218098,0.01125541,0.3193703,0.01609633,0.00128327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1491691,0.0004459973,0.8482269,0.001274614,0.0001441777,0.0002459332,0.0004433375,0.000001144057,0.00004880156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5673027,0.000008153374,0.4324596,0.0001152358,0.00001338664,0.00000188812,6.175612e-7,0.000006539402,0.00009187993],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4181336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3222207470392424,"score_gpt":0.3899817066884061,"score_spread":0.06776095964916379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}