{"id":"W2020209089","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550360204","title":"Likelihood and bayesian approaches to inference for the stationary point of a quadratic response surface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Stationary point; Bayesian inference; Parametrization (atmospheric modeling); Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Inference; Quadratic equation; Polynomial; Quadratic function; Point estimation; Algorithm; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03197633,0.001357086,0.00269029,0.00387791,0.001175936,0.002743926,0.00335676,0.002926653,0.005143016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1335451,0.001715223,0.002634175,0.002651358,0.005428344,0.004261034,0.003177018,0.004233356,0.0006678317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002928721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002286668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00582758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003948952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823314,0.0133487,0.0005456514,0.00156093,0.001807272,0.0004060726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8398894,0.1515021,0.003256047,0.002373158,0.002411517,0.0005676629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996317,0.0001051234,0.001631203,0.0003339835,0.0002383893,0.0001442358,0.0002960361,0.5390716,0.0009695346,0.4075451,0.001109576,0.04825568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005325666,0.00004347942,0.0005263301,0.00006487714,0.00003447676,0.0000406537,0.00002887724,0.6732326,0.0003693584,0.3248295,0.0007337577,0.000042895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005099471,0.0002501823,0.9934838,0.0003868083,0.00001509771,0.00003564463,0.00004307673,0.00005636367,0.0006294721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3746454,0.001046297,0.6191306,0.0004380253,0.0001976192,0.0008034144,0.0003793571,0.0002171226,0.003142188],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03197633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.169109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3222207470392424,"score_gpt":0.3899817066884061,"score_spread":0.06776095964916379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}