{"id":"W2020239117","doi":"10.1007/s10342-009-0286-2","title":"Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of variable-exponent taper equations for lodgepole pine in Alberta, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta; Universidad de Chile; Universidad Austral de Chile; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Statistics; Covariance; Autocorrelation; Volume (thermodynamics); Estimator; Mixed model; Ecology; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002718328,0.001045693,0.001394206,0.00086535,0.002037891,0.002034256,0.003505567,0.001625467,0.0032848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00619309,0.001119151,0.001192946,0.0008910206,0.001131509,0.0008960129,0.0009696176,0.001659004,0.0003080537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01126755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01541784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9682218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992022,0.0002968683,0.0000376961,0.0001761897,0.0001037594,0.0001833981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961765,0.002348666,0.0002147167,0.00009615345,0.0009786984,0.0001853604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002793752,0.0001455774,0.02841695,0.00005853644,0.0001946431,0.0001982019,0.0002721708,0.9540866,0.0006214519,0.004482475,0.001742098,0.009501901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003252998,0.00001863447,0.005701937,0.000009663945,0.00004873299,0.00000925465,0.0001001975,0.992802,0.0001093734,0.0006142766,0.0005240689,0.00002932445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451756,0.001104032,0.04728614,0.0008686591,0.0001157844,0.00009770636,0.001667974,0.0003927954,0.003291353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750235,0.0004090806,0.01368603,0.00006509801,0.00003072832,0.00007074954,0.001119525,0.0000858198,0.00950943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02976298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08175224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02544867446604876,"score_gpt":0.2768839428724918,"score_spread":0.251435268406443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}