{"id":"W2020572400","doi":"10.1007/s002670010164","title":"Environmental Policy Implementation in Rural China: A Case Study of Yuhang, Zhejiang","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Guelph","funders":"Zhejiang University","keywords":"China; Industrialisation; Business; Agency (philosophy); Guanxi; Environmental security; Politics; Rural area; Environmental quality; Social security; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Geography; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003153333,0.0001596151,0.0001810993,0.0001244895,0.0002492939,0.00002708903,0.0001911971,0.00003986353,0.0008285389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001635991,0.0001640941,0.00006755645,0.0001182897,0.0001376848,0.0003178255,0.0001941337,0.00008712899,0.00004794033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001218649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001108226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04817663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01391818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985639,0.00009397403,0.0003757016,0.0002630314,0.0003404578,0.0003629278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994988,0.00001124777,0.000188088,0.0002197927,4.88852e-7,0.00008161766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003865825,0.001800959,0.6903558,0.00001117502,0.0001004459,0.001171654,0.1028779,0.0001730157,0.000113998,0.001279408,0.0001319124,0.201945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001594526,0.0001404835,0.573304,0.000006192673,0.00001831992,0.00002388586,0.4199441,0.00001532432,0.00001597384,0.0001941937,0.004582686,0.0001603496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949625,0.00008274616,0.00001162487,0.0002394277,0.00008934929,0.001051313,0.00001920968,0.00001474523,0.003529099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975001,0.000827469,0.00004749598,0.00006965354,0.0001034228,0.00008068378,0.00001099801,0.00001610516,0.001344107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3170662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006221211823553233,"score_gpt":0.282368794612783,"score_spread":0.2761475827892298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}